Here’s my January series: the ABC’s of 21st Century Cities. In previous entries, I explored Artificial Intelligence and Backward Futures. Today is Co-creation.
- Underbelly Project, New York City artists took an abandoned subway and secretly created artwork on the surfaces. The installation was open for one night to a select few.
- German Guerrilla Bench appears to be a transformer and opens into a bench.
Is a co-created future one that you would welcome? On the one hand we just want our cities to work well for us, to live in an area that is beautiful, healthy, and suits our lifestyle. Yet seeing a group of people around the world improve cities again and again. Having the city, designers, and developers working as partners would be thrilling. A constantly better place to live. When we see the city as a whole, we begin to understand deeply grounded interconnections. We stop wasteful development patterns and use limited resources including ourselves towards the greater good. Far from a Pollyanna approach, it’s survival. In our healthiest, most sustainable, life affirming forms, cities and people will be constellations of connections, linked through unanticipated discoveries.
Next article, D is for Disasters.
Images: VM Mountain Dwellings by BIG on ArchDaily; Give a Minute Chicago Civic Engagement Project on Sustainable Cities Collective. More reading: participation,co-creating.









Hi Cindy,I am digging this series. In acting (and physics;-) there is a basic tenet which goes “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” I love to watch it at work on screen and stage when two or more people really get on a roll of honestly listening to and reacting off of one another. But I find it especially thrilling in a crowd scene when a quick scan of the entire picture shows every actor to be in the moment regardless of the perceived importance of their role.This is what I love most about Christopher Alexander’s work as well, the emphasis that he puts on the value of a place being a direct result of the participation of its inhabitants.Thanks for writing…-b
Hello Barry – Love your connection to acting. you got it, that’s the idea of emergence. We build on each other, not knowing where its going. “being there.” Will be scary for people – urban regimes – to allow emergent cities, a sense of losing control. so maybe there will be designated emergent zones? have no idea. In a smaller way, cities are emergent already – we change them as we use them. the moment we finish construction, the building changes through users choices and through de facto demolition, unless we intervene. in contrast, landscapes grow, ten-twenty years before they reach maturity. arrive ugly and grow more beautiful.Maybe cities can be more like landscapes, if we let them? too much fixed about the city. will be intriguing to see. So glad you like this series! makes it worth the work – and I am learning too. its emergent. think I know where its going and then I write on something different b/c of a comment or idea. Not learned to post daily but I hope to. You and jb know how… (she says admiringly). I dont have that pattern or rhythm figured out yet, maybe this week?? its a new day.
Nice post! In 2010 we at Face ran a project called Co-Create London. The idea was to use co-creation’s to consider urban issues by treating citydwellers as active, creative, decision-making equals rather than passive recipients of top-down design, and developing ideas from the bottom up.For Co-Create London, we asked Londoners “What would you do to make London a better place?”These ideas were crowdsourced at cocreatelondon.com, with participants voting for the ideas they thought were the best, and commenting and making modifications. Some of the top ideas from this stage were then taken forward to a co-creation workshop where ordinary people and urban experts worked together to develop prototype schemes and solutions for the city. The next step is to take them to Mayor Boris Johnson and see if we can make them really happen!http://www.facegroup.co.uk/co-create-london-initial-resultsMore broadly, I love what you’re saying about emergence too. Tech companies have learnt that their product isn’t a fixed, finished object when it’s released to the public – but instead that the product keeps on developing and can become things they weren’t expecting. E.g. Microsoft’s Kinect and applications in medicine:http://sectorpublic.com/2010/11/xbox-kinect-applications-to-health-and-medicine/Architects and planners, however, still really struggle to escape the auteur-delusion that they’re the creators and builders, and the rest of us essentially passive recipients. Rearrangeable walls and partitions are about as far as they’ll go… Which is no way far enough.
Jay – you got it, that’s a huge step forward on co-creating. You bring it out of theory and into practice. And your question was open ended. So often, for ease I suppose, people frame questions as this, this or this – limiting the whole project. And you did another brilliant move – getting different types of people together – community, experts, and politicians. Co-creating is inventive and it’s also political, yes? Please keep me posted -via twitter works great. Good luck on your progress. its’ a worthwhile project. It’s a planning project; next comes ‘making’ projects, yes?
Of all the C topics you could have chosen, Cindy, I’m delighted you picked this one! The grand projects are a thing of the past for now in most places. In their places will be projects that are small and incremental, and that involve many more stake-holders. More Jacobs, less Moses. At the end of your alphabet series, this likely will be one of the most important. Not sure I ever mentioned this, but check out the Sky Method, which is my contribution to co-creation… It completely remakes the American development paradigm into an incremental model built over many years where every property-owner participates in ongoing development. It requires very little up-front infrastructure, possibly bypassing the broken development financing system entirely. Here’s the link:http://www.originalgreen.org/OG/Presentations_files/Sky_Method.pdf