Yesterday, I introduced a January series: the ABC’s of 21st Century Cities. Today’s the first letter A.
Will AI cities like us, be our friend?
The self-aware, self-improving, sentient city will adopt the patterns of the existing city. Machines are purely rational. Humans are intuitive, emotional, and imperfect plus we are culturally determined. A machine can only copy or replicate these characteristics, which might be flawless. That’s the problem with the conversant computer. It does not know how to improvise, make errors, be human.
We love our houses, favorite shops, parks, even our cars. These attachments will become exponentially deeper. They will remember key dates and react on cue. They will know our habits and when we break routine. If your house can talk to you, play scrabble, fix you meals, layout your clothes, wake you up, start the coffee, prepare your shower, order the groceries, complete your reports, and sing you to sleep, will you believe it cares for you?
- We will need retraining on the meaning of artificial.
- Will we ever be able to move? Will we strip the house-friend of its knowledge and mourn its death?
- Will AI computers strive for self-preservation? And to self-replicate? Will they hoard or aggressively acquire materials to create their projects?
- Will they share our most precious secrets? Doesn’t Facebook do it every single day? We won’t need to report our sins; the shaman and tax officer and probably your mom, daughter, enemies, and neighbors will already know.
The city’s brain
As we build swarms of self-improving intelligent machines, we will need a meta-AI to monitor and coordinate. That’s HAL9000. Will we be able to control it? I rather doubt it. Furthermore, how safe will that concentrated power be? Imagine the cyber attacks and security threats when so much power is held by one entity.
- When all the machines are hooked together as an army of super-intelligent computers, are they controllable?
- Moreover, will we become part of the super-intelligence? Notice that Singularity U includes neuroscience. Later, we will look at transhumanism and our active participation in collective intelligence.
Cities will be smart. They will be more beautiful, more exquisitely made in parts and more assembled ad hoc in other parts. More resourceful and more transparently knowable. Unlike today’s “dumb cities” that sit like the dead materials that they are, future cities will be alive in a Biomimicry sense, evolving, learning, and growing. The caveat is huge. A city as a functioning extension of the people may be the most intoxicating experience we can imagine. The most creative and potentially invasive intelligent computers will work in partnership with people. We have to be able to let go, opt out. Increasingly, it will be impossible unless we demand it.
Tomorrow, B is for Backward.
Images: Robotic construction in NYC on ArchDaily, Ford Sync Destination Eco-navigation system and New Songdo in Fast Co, automated road trains on Crunchgear, PlanIT Masterplan, Geminoid robot.






I’ve been thinking about something like a road train for some time (as I’m sure many people have.) Now, if we were able to replace pavement with a magnetic strip or other technology that delivered the necessary navigational AI along designated paths, and the vehicles could stay on this minimalistic track by hovering over it 4 meters off the ground or so, the impact of roads on the environment, it would seem, would be reduced, as flora and fauna could utilize the ground without our needing to modify the landscape as dramatically as roads do now. In areas with dense population, this would allow more pedestrian use of space.Admittedly, there would be a lot to work out to implement such a scenario, and I am no scientist, but I suspect that the technology to do it is less far-fetched than many people would think. In the light of growing populations and reduced environmental resources, should this not also be a consideration in transportation innovations?
Hi Cindy,You are coming out of the gate at warp speed here… Very Cool.This sentence caught my mind: ” If your house can talk to you, play scrabble, fix you meals, layout your clothes, wake you up, start the coffee, prepare your shower, order the groceries, complete your reports, and sing you to sleep, will you believe it cares for you?”The question made me think about how we perceive the limits of artificial intelligence. If a human were doing all of the things, that you mentioned, for us we would call it caring but somehow a machine caring for us seems alien. This may be the other side of the coin as far as machines being able to achieve sentience. Will they get there, with our help, before we truly believe they are capable of being there? Will they become self aware, realize our prejudices and point them out to us? Really interesting stuff, all of it, and it is both scary and thrilling…Thanks, as always, for a great post.-b
Hi Barry, yeah, its all possible eventually. a study gave ppl a robot to live w/ and boom, they fell in love w/ them. First thing in the morning, “hello, robot, how ya doing?” we are prone to caring, arent we? A Japanese inventor makes the most lifelike robots too, those will really test us. and it happens gradually. A breakthru here, another there, and pretty soon, yr talking to a machine lk its yr brother. then the machine starts correcting you?? rutrow, that options coming out! give me the ‘yes cindy’ bot…
Most ai will just be in the background, sensing, doing things, making life easier. Except when they break. more machines, more headaches. like nano-coatings will just recoat and change w/ weather conditions, absorb and distribute energy, collect and send data. We’ll just install and forget abt it. Doubt if we fall in love w/ smart paint, yes?? thanks for reading, yeah, cool.
A.T. – yes, that’s almost Jetson world, isn’t it? hovering transportation. I’m in favor of anything that reduces roads, their constant maintenance which is sucking up resources in all the developed countries, esp US, and reducing harm to the environment. has to have a fail-safe so no one falls 4 meters to the ground when things go wrong, yes? ouch. and no littering please, I’m walking/riding my bike down here! heh. I agree, its more of a design problem once the science gets resolved. Many old futures drawn in the early and mid 20th century had stacked transportation modes. The only place that’s true so far is w/ subways. thanks for reading and for sharing your ideas, v inventive.